We have installed the latest version of Horizon View with some users using AutoCAD or other graphics applications....
What are your experiences with the current selection of thin clients? Is there a consensus on the best available depending on the needs of the end user? Is there much value in having decent hardware inside?
For Horizon View clients in general, it makes most sense to have zero clients with the Teradici chip inside. Given that you don't need to add anything to the client, the thin client will not give you more features than the zero client.
The VMware View Connection Server does not have graphics-acceleration capabilities. That functionality is in the vSphere hypervisor that makes both software-based graphics acceleration and hardware-based acceleration available with NVIDIA adapters, which allow ESXi to use the graphics processing unit from that hardware.
There is a very good white paper available from VMware that describes hardware-accelerated three-dimensional graphics performance in Horizon View 5.2 here (.pdf).
Dig Deeper on Working with VMware View
Related Q&A from Rob Bastiaansen
There are a number of details to consider when building a VMware home lab but there are some general best practices to follow.continue reading
Setting up the performance counters in the vSphere client can help troubleshoot a dropped packets issue.continue reading
A user with an XP VM has a few options to try to connect that VM to the Mac host.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.