Art Allianz - Fotolia
Although VMware provides the extensive software stack used in EVO:RAIL appliances, VMware doesn't sell the hardware that runs EVO:RAIL. Instead, the appliances are purchased and supported through the hardware vendors -- such as Dell, HP and EMC -- or the vendors' channel partners.
For example, Version 1.0 of Dell's EVO:RAIL Infrastructure Edition for general-purpose VM workloads is available directly from Dell and through Dell PartnerDirect Partners including Preferred and Premier Partners. Dell lists this EVO:RAIL version at $150,000 which includes all hardware, software and three years of Dell ProSupport. Dell also notes a price of $100,000 for customers with VMware vSphere Enterprise Plus using the vSphere Loyalty Program which allows some vSphere licenses to transfer to the EVO:RAIL.
As another example, HP's 200-HC EVO:RAIL for general purpose virtualized workloads is currently available through resellers and PartnerOne partners. The system is priced at $260,000 and carries three years of HP Proactive Care services for 24x7 support with four-hour response times. However, HP does offer to renew support for two additional years for up to five years total.
While the underlying premise of the EVO:RAIL is consistency , it still helps to shop around, compare prices and service terms, and pay close attention to specifications because some later versions of the EVO:RAIL will scale to eight appliances -- or 32 nodes -- rather than the initial releases which scaled to four appliances -- or 16 nodes. As HP demonstrates, it's also possible to extend the EVO:RAIL's baseline three-year lifecycle with additional service to help ease capital expenditures. This can be particularly helpful when EVO:RAIL appliances experience light utilization, are deployed to remote locations or experience other conditions that challenge frequent technology refresh cycles.
Dig Deeper on Selecting storage and hardware for VMware environments
Related Q&A from Stephen J. Bigelow
Containers have rapidly come into focus as a popular option for deploying applications, but they have limitations and are fundamentally different ... Continue Reading
ALM and SDLC both cover much of the same ground, such as development, testing and deployment. Where these lifecycle concepts differ is the scope of ... Continue Reading
Eliciting performance requirements from business end users necessitates a clearly defined scope and the right set of questions. Expert Mary Gorman ... Continue Reading